Type on cartography
May 8th, 2009It’s incredible how the variety of typefaces and styles in modern maps and atlassen is so poor compared to old xilographic ones.
For example Google maps (one of the moden most used maps) use only Helevetica in black with a white outline, as there is only one, or two typographic level to understand and analyze maps. Of course, the system interaction allow to display less information rather than the whole amount of informationa of a non scalable map, but still streets, monuments, rivers and so on are pointed with the same typography.
Unfortunately the same problem still persist also on lots of new digital printed maps, where the whole informations levels appear at he same time.
The bad habit using and being friendly with Google maps seems has changed the way of designing cartography so, nowadays, the typographic variety on maps are really poor, using a not fit for maps fonts and improving level separation using colors rather than forms.
The digital font market propose just one font designed expecially for cartography: the Cisalpin from linotype, designed by Felix Arnold.
The Swiss designer/typographer Felix Arnold designed Cisalpin during the late 1990s, after he had challenged himself to create a contemporary typeface that could be used for cartographic uses. He came to the subject of cartographic typefaces after analyzing many maps and atlases, and discovering that there was no standard typeface for these types of documents.
From the linotype website there is a short outline of typographic requirements of cartography wich Arnold desumed from his research:
- very legible at small sizes
- the various weights all clearly differentiated from one another
- narrowness. Words close in around themselves to help them become more identifiable
- durable letterforms. Letterfoms itselves have to maintain their readability when placed over complex backgrounds. They have open interior forms, flattened curves, tall x-heights, and a capital height that almost reaches the tops of the ascenders
- italic should have a very clear angle of inclination
- optimize each letterform in the family so that they cannot be easily mistaken for another. This again helps minimize the misunderstandings that often occur because of illegibility.
So why just one font on the market with only 4 weights? It seems we still need a wider font choice to cover all the problem a map can has.
Take for example this italian atlas (printed in 1945). In these picture we can recognize at more than 10 different styles, but still it seems the font stucture cames out from the same idea, as a kind of superfamily that cover all the information layers these maps need to show.
The most interesting solutions made by xilographers who have “typed” all words on maps are, in my opinion the back slanted font and this sort of connected italic. Sometimes the two styles are even mixed toghether generating a third original new font. Great!








The idea that cames out is that could be a sort of matrix for designing this superfamily where font structure, inclinations, serifs styles and connections mix and cross one with the other allowing to organize information just using typography (all text are always in balck).
For sure this is a good starting process to design a new font for maps, wich actually is the project I and some friend are leading during a type design class here in Milan at CFP Bauer School.
So stick around, good news are coming!
andren














